Which of the following may be a consequence of nonjudicial punishment?

The correct answer reflects that extra duties can indeed be a consequence of nonjudicial punishment (NJP). NJP is a disciplinary action taken to address minor offenses without a court-martial. When a service member undergoes NJP, the commanding officer often imposes various punishments to correct behavior, and assigning extra duties is a common and effective method. This form of punishment serves as a means of promoting accountability while allowing the individual to maintain their rank and minimize more severe consequences.

The rationale behind extra duties as a consequence is centered on rehabilitation and ensuring that the service member understands the importance of adhering to regulations and maintaining good conduct. It’s intended to reinforce discipline through increased responsibility without the more severe implications that come with other forms of punishment, such as reductions in pay grades or demotion.

The other options represent potential outcomes of NJP too but focus on actions that would significantly alter the service member’s career path or standing, which are not immediate effects of the disciplinary process aimed at restoring behavior.